Tony Stark: Hey. You can do this, Heather. If you think we missed any quote from Tony Stark or Iron Man 3, please send it to us. Tony Stark: Oh God, not again. Taggert: Thank you, I mean for understanding. That was really violent. I think you should close your eyes. Now last time I went missing, if I remember correctly, you came looking for me. Release Date April 30, Aldrich Killian: Uh, nothing, sir. Colonel James Rhodes: Yeah, a little bit. Tony Stark: Yes, this is normal!
Tony Stark: No idea. Gods, aliens, other dimensions. Hold on. Initiating virtual crime scene reconstruction. As in enhanced soldiers, private armies, and Tony is not… It has to be noted that Iron Man 3 suffers a bit of iron deficiency. Harley Keener: Let me go! Tony Stark: For what?
Remember when I told you, that I have an anxiety issue? Bruce Banner: Elevator in Switzerland. Tony Stark: Uh, say, Jarvis, is it that time? How did you get that cap on your head? Vice President Rodriguez: Welcome back to the land of the living. I had winners. Deflecting an incoming star, railgun style, Meaning of "as it was, she witnessed minor twinges of the appropriate emotions occurring distantly, as if to some other girl", Bigger house, lower down, or smaller house larger down.
Sleepy Mandarin Girl: Why is it so hot in here? Voice of Guard: All personnel, Stark is loose and somewhere in the compound. Everybody, grab your monkey!
Tony Stark: Bring up the thermogenic signatures again, factor in three thousand degrees. Gary the Cameraman: Excuse me, sir. Happy Hogan: What was that? Counterpoint: Despite how unconvincing Tony Stark's symptoms seem to be, Travis Langley, who is well-known for psychological analyses of comic book characters, claims in his column about the topic for Psychology Today that his behavior does accurately resemble someone in great denial of their PTSD.
Furthermore, one could vouch for the anxiety subplot as a refreshing twist on our standards for superheroes' invulnerability and on the character of Iron Man as a whole. I mean, that is not an argument that I would make, personally, as I still find it so lazily wedged in, especially by how it seems to disappear by the third act, but it is an argument that someone could make.
Speaking of arguments, has Marvel ever faced a backlash of more incendiary value than from the twist of The Mandarin's true identity in? For many, this is the moment when Iron Man 3 completely craps the bed , not just as a poorly executed punchline to an already pointless burnout joke, but as a gross disservice to fans who had anticipated a worthy debut of one of their favorite antagonists.
Counterpoint: Of course, there are those who feel otherwise, including co-writer and director Shane Black himself, who defended the twist as an unusual surprise to a normally predictable summer blockbuster that was almost too successful in exceeding expectations.
Some fans and critics agree, believing the fake out to be just what Iron Man 3 needed to stand out as more than another superhero and even deepens its coherence with the rest of the Marvel Cinematic Universe. I, for one, could take or leave the Mandarin twist, because, in my eyes, even the reveal of a fake villain is not as weak as the film's true villain.
You know, perhaps Shane Black should be applauded for that Mandarin misdirect because the reveal of Aldrich Killian Guy Pearce as the true antagonist the could not more obvious. The character is a cookie cutter villain by typical Iron Man movie standards for his jealous grudge against Tony Stark after blowing him off at a New Year's Eve party that, inexplicably, exists after his own achievement of wealth.
His plan against Stark is so convoluted and his motivations are so questionable , neither of which is made better by the embarrassing realization that Iron Man 3 rips off the plot of The Incredibles , essentially. Counterpoint: Even though a smaller portion of fans seem to pick up on those similarities, the case against Aldrich Killian is one even most Iron Man 3 's biggest supporters actually do agree with.
The biggest argument in his defense that I have found is how his greedy, science-based goals are at least a break from the typical otherworldliness of most MCU villains of that time, excluding the fact that he can regrow limbs and breathe fire. Plus, it should also be noted that Marvel had not really figured their villain problem just yet. I know what you're gonna say—that's a terrible superhero movie. But I disagree. Fantastic Four , now that's a terrible superhero movie. Iron Man 3 wasn't so bad.
Especially not that part where Tony Stark has to go to the store and MacGyver his way into a temporary suit. However, I did notice something annoying in a scene near the end. Iron Man needs to recharge his suit, and he improvises by connecting two cables one red and one black from a car battery to his suit. When he is mostly charged up, he pulls off the cables—one at a time.
First he pulls the red cable off and it creates a slight sparking effect. Right after that he pulls off the black cable and it also makes a spark. See the mistake? One of the cables could easily make a spark, but not both. You can get a spark when air changes from an electrical insulator into an electrical conductor.
This happens not at a certain electric potential difference voltage but at a certain electric field strength. Let me explain the difference with an example.
Suppose you have two wires connected to a 9 volt battery with the free ends of the wires held just 1 centimeter apart. The electric potential difference between these two ends is 9 volts. That's probably not a huge surprise. If I move the wires closer together, they still make a 9 volt potential. However, the electric field depends on both the potential and the distance.
As I move the wires closer together, the electric field gets stronger between the two wires. I know you didn't like that example, so how about an analogy? Instead of electric stuff, I have a hill. The height of the hill is like the change in electric potential. The slope of the hill at some point would be the electric field. So now I have a 9 meter tall hill instead of 9 volts. As the bottom and top of the hill move closer together horizontally the slope gets steeper.
That's just like the difference between electric potential difference and the electric field. Bonus: Note the importance of calling the electric potential a "difference" or "change in"—just like a hill, the change in height is the key, not just the top of the hill.
Now back to sparks. A spark is created by a high electric field, not a high voltage. With a 9 volt battery and assuming a constant electric field for simplicity , you would need two wires to get 3 micrometers apart to cause a spark. That's one super tiny spark.
0コメント